Go to Top

Blog Archives

More E-Filing News: Fourth Circuit Implementing “NextGen CM/ECF,” Users MUST Update Their Accounts

Recently the Supreme Court announced that it was taking a step forward technologically (see here).  Today, the Fourth Circuit made a similar announcement, revealing that effective November 13, 2017 the Court will go live on “NextGen CM/ECF.”  The most significant change accompanying the implementation of this updated filing system will be that users will have a single PACER account that will allow them to file (and simply view) documents in all …Read More

More on the Incompleteness of a Record on Appeal

Recently we blogged about how the completeness, or lack thereof, of the record on appeal can be a deciding factor in the outcome of an appeal.  See here, discussing State v. Cobb. On Tuesday the Court of Appeals drove that point home even further, dismissing an appeal on the basis of an incomplete record.  In Columbus County Department of Social Services v. Norton, a father, proceeding pro se, appealed two …Read More

Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt—the Record on Appeal or the Trial Court?

What is the Court of Appeals to do when the correctness of the trial court order being appealed turns on whether or not a certain document was presented to the trial court, but that document does not appear in the record on appeal?  That is the question that confronted the Court in State v. Cobb.  And in a split decision issued on Wednesday, the majority presumed that the record on appeal …Read More

Fourth Circuit Affirms that Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Challenge North Carolina Law Allowing Magistrates to Refuse to Perform Same-Sex Marriages

In a published opinion authored by Judge Wilkinson, the Fourth Circuit today rejected a challenge by three same-sex couples to the North Carolina law that allows county magistrates to refuse to perform same-sex marriages on the ground of “religious objection.”  The Court upheld the district court’s determination that the plaintiffs lacked standing to pursue a claim under the Establishment Clause.  The couples, who were all either married or engaged to be …Read More

How a Final Judgment Loses Its Finality

It’s a fairly common maneuver by plaintiffs’ attorneys: the trial court dismisses claims against some, but not all, defendants in a multi-defendant lawsuit, so the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the remaining defendants in order to pursue an immediate appeal of the dismissal order.  The reason for this procedural wrangling is that while the lawsuit against the non-dismissed defendants is still pending, the dismissal order is interlocutory and, absent Rule 54(b) certification or an affected substantial right, that order is …Read More

Governor Cooper Sues to Challenge Bill Downsizing Court of Appeals

As previously blogged about here, here, here, and here, the North Carolina General Assembly recently passed a bill that would reduce the number of seats on the North Carolina Court of Appeals from 15 to 12.  Now the constitutionality of the bill is being challenged in court by North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, who had vetoed the bill but then saw that veto overridden by the General Assembly.  Read about the Wake County …Read More

Initial En Banc Review Not the Only Unique Part of Fourth Circuit Hearing on Revised Travel Ban

As we discussed recently on this blog, the Fourth Circuit took the unusual step of ordering initial en banc review of President Trump’s revised federal travel ban.  But not only is the Court hearing the case en banc, it is also planning to allow the audio of the May 8 hearing to be broadcast in real time on C-SPAN.  This is, I believe, a first for the Fourth Circuit, which …Read More

BREAKING NEWS: John Arrowood to Replace Judge McCullough on Court of Appeals

North Carolina Court of Appeals Judge Doug McCullough earlier today announced his retirement from the bench, effective immediately, only a month and a few days before he was to reach the mandatory retirement age on May 28.  Governor Roy Cooper immediately appointed former Court of Appeals judge John Arrowood to fill the seat left vacant by Judge McCullough’s early retirement.  This surprising chain of events appears to be directly related to proposed legislation that would reduce …Read More

A Jurisdictional Jamboree (including an RPR sighting!)

Tuesday’s batch of opinions from the Court of Appeals contained a smorgasbord of jurisdictional issues pertaining to interlocutory appeals. In no particular order: Department of Transportation v. Riddle This condemnation proceeding involved a partial taking by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“DOT”). The Riddles owned a parcel of land that they had subdivided into seven separate lots. The DOT originally commenced the action by filing a complaint and declaration …Read More

Using Standards of Review to Prevail on Appeal

SML Appellate Practice Group members Andrea Cataland (Atlanta) and Kip Nelson (Raleigh/Greensboro), recently had an informative article featured in the latest issue of DRI’s For the Defense.  Andrea and Kip discuss the standards of review that must be applied by appellate courts to every issue they consider, and how appellate practitioners can effectively use this important legal principle in their advocacy before appellate courts. Click HERE for the full article. –Patrick Kane